<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Deliberately Barren Self Is Having Issues</title>
	<link>http://www.feministsdontbakebread.com/2007/05/03/my-deliberately-barren-self-is-having-issues/</link>
	<description>Neither do they knit. Apparently.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 13:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rho_iota</title>
		<link>http://www.feministsdontbakebread.com/2007/05/03/my-deliberately-barren-self-is-having-issues/#comment-3284</link>
		<dc:creator>Rho_iota</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.feministsdontbakebread.com/2007/05/03/my-deliberately-barren-self-is-having-issues/#comment-3284</guid>
		<description>Australia does allow some adoption by Gay and Lesbians but it's appallingly limited, and only exists to some degree in some states - Western Australia and Canberra.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Australia does allow some adoption by Gay and Lesbians but it&#8217;s appallingly limited, and only exists to some degree in some states - Western Australia and Canberra.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://www.feministsdontbakebread.com/2007/05/03/my-deliberately-barren-self-is-having-issues/#comment-1787</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 06:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.feministsdontbakebread.com/2007/05/03/my-deliberately-barren-self-is-having-issues/#comment-1787</guid>
		<description>What I find more insulting is the assumption that ALL of her constituents had families and children. What, am I an unperson because I don't want to have any offspring? Do I not get a voice in governance?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I find more insulting is the assumption that ALL of her constituents had families and children. What, am I an unperson because I don&#8217;t want to have any offspring? Do I not get a voice in governance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wanda the woops!ter</title>
		<link>http://www.feministsdontbakebread.com/2007/05/03/my-deliberately-barren-self-is-having-issues/#comment-1067</link>
		<dc:creator>Wanda the woops!ter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 00:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.feministsdontbakebread.com/2007/05/03/my-deliberately-barren-self-is-having-issues/#comment-1067</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to drop you  a friendly (optimistic)note to share a bit of Creative Activism.

The woops! team is a new group of artists who gather verbal gaffs made by public figures and plaster them on t-shirts, in songs, in photos.

Our very first move is Deliberately Barren.

Need we say more?

Here's the site:
&lt;a href="http://www.cafepress.com/woops" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.cafepress.com/woops&lt;/a&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to drop you  a friendly (optimistic)note to share a bit of Creative Activism.</p>
<p>The woops! team is a new group of artists who gather verbal gaffs made by public figures and plaster them on t-shirts, in songs, in photos.</p>
<p>Our very first move is Deliberately Barren.</p>
<p>Need we say more?</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the site:<br />
<a href="http://www.cafepress.com/woops" rel="nofollow">http://www.cafepress.com/woops</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo</title>
		<link>http://www.feministsdontbakebread.com/2007/05/03/my-deliberately-barren-self-is-having-issues/#comment-1066</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 14:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.feministsdontbakebread.com/2007/05/03/my-deliberately-barren-self-is-having-issues/#comment-1066</guid>
		<description>This was a gem that just jumped out at me, from the first section:

&lt;blockquote&gt;"The question of whether people have children, whether they marry and have children, is entirely a matter for them and &lt;em&gt;I do not think it should be a matter of public comment," Mr Howard told reporters. [emphasis mine]&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Notice what he didn't say, that the question of whether &lt;em&gt;women&lt;/em&gt; marry and have children is entirely a matter for them and &lt;em&gt;is not&lt;/em&gt;a matter of public comment.

This tells me:

1) He uses 'people' to generalize the matter (as though men are ever subject to this particular brand of scrutiny) and make it sound like there's no sexism here.

2) He does not deny, as the BBC's line of questioning that follows indicates, that it in fact &lt;strong&gt;is&lt;/strong&gt; a matter for public comment.

3) He is not willing to stand up to the patriarchy, in that he uses multiple qualifiers to weaken his stance:  He doesn't "think" that it "should be" a matter for public comment.

4) His use of "marry and have children" is typically hetero-normative, and shows the patriarchy's agenda that the two always go together.

So, Anna, I wouldn't even say that this has been "condemned" -- there has been some minor wrist-slappage, but nothing further, as far as I've heard.

Two little pissy addenda:

-- He apologized last year, then did it again.  He's not sorry.

-- They put her statement about the whole thing &lt;em&gt;last&lt;/em&gt;.  It's about &lt;em&gt;her&lt;/em&gt; and she's billed last.  Oh, no, my mistake, it's actually all about the menz.

*grrrrrrrrr*  IBTP.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a gem that just jumped out at me, from the first section:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The question of whether people have children, whether they marry and have children, is entirely a matter for them and <em>I do not think it should be a matter of public comment,&#8221; Mr Howard told reporters. [emphasis mine]</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Notice what he didn&#8217;t say, that the question of whether <em>women</em> marry and have children is entirely a matter for them and <em>is not</em>a matter of public comment.</p>
<p>This tells me:</p>
<p>1) He uses &#8216;people&#8217; to generalize the matter (as though men are ever subject to this particular brand of scrutiny) and make it sound like there&#8217;s no sexism here.</p>
<p>2) He does not deny, as the BBC&#8217;s line of questioning that follows indicates, that it in fact <strong>is</strong> a matter for public comment.</p>
<p>3) He is not willing to stand up to the patriarchy, in that he uses multiple qualifiers to weaken his stance:  He doesn&#8217;t &#8220;think&#8221; that it &#8220;should be&#8221; a matter for public comment.</p>
<p>4) His use of &#8220;marry and have children&#8221; is typically hetero-normative, and shows the patriarchy&#8217;s agenda that the two always go together.</p>
<p>So, Anna, I wouldn&#8217;t even say that this has been &#8220;condemned&#8221; &#8212; there has been some minor wrist-slappage, but nothing further, as far as I&#8217;ve heard.</p>
<p>Two little pissy addenda:</p>
<p>&#8211; He apologized last year, then did it again.  He&#8217;s not sorry.</p>
<p>&#8211; They put her statement about the whole thing <em>last</em>.  It&#8217;s about <em>her</em> and she&#8217;s billed last.  Oh, no, my mistake, it&#8217;s actually all about the menz.</p>
<p>*grrrrrrrrr*  IBTP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.feministsdontbakebread.com/2007/05/03/my-deliberately-barren-self-is-having-issues/#comment-1065</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 11:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.feministsdontbakebread.com/2007/05/03/my-deliberately-barren-self-is-having-issues/#comment-1065</guid>
		<description>As well, what about couples that decide not to have children?  Does that make them poor leaders or somehow diminish their empathy for those that chose another way?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As well, what about couples that decide not to have children?  Does that make them poor leaders or somehow diminish their empathy for those that chose another way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
