Comments on: Sex, Rape - to some people, i guess they’re the same thing http://www.feministsdontbakebread.com/2007/03/23/sex-rape-to-some-people-i-guess-theyre-the-same-thing/ Neither do they knit. Apparently. Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:46:40 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: Anna http://www.feministsdontbakebread.com/2007/03/23/sex-rape-to-some-people-i-guess-theyre-the-same-thing/#comment-630 Anna Sun, 25 Mar 2007 05:29:55 +0000 http://www.feministsdontbakebread.com/2007/03/23/sex-rape-to-some-people-i-guess-theyre-the-same-thing/#comment-630 Again, it gets back to that whole concept that feminists seem to think that men are adults and capable of reigning in their unbridled passions, and yet, we're the man-haters. *sigh* I hope you write that blog post, Jo. I'll look out for it. Again, it gets back to that whole concept that feminists seem to think that men are adults and capable of reigning in their unbridled passions, and yet, we’re the man-haters.

*sigh*

I hope you write that blog post, Jo. I’ll look out for it.

]]> By: Jo http://www.feministsdontbakebread.com/2007/03/23/sex-rape-to-some-people-i-guess-theyre-the-same-thing/#comment-629 Jo Sun, 25 Mar 2007 05:22:03 +0000 http://www.feministsdontbakebread.com/2007/03/23/sex-rape-to-some-people-i-guess-theyre-the-same-thing/#comment-629 Interestingly enough, Ms. Redmond's statement mirrors some of the labels applied to feminists, namely that they "think all sex is rape". There's an analysis in here somewhere, and I'm having trouble with it. :-/ The steps I'm seeing are: If a woman's consent matters, then all sex *can* = rape. Redmond/anti-fems: If a woman's consent matters, then all sex *does* = rape. Again, Red/antis: If a woman's consent doesn't matter, then all sex *does not* = rape. So the only way to prevent (ignore) rape is (according to antis) to completely disregard women's consent. Grrr. There's a massive blog post in here somewhere. (April 5, huh?) Interestingly enough, Ms. Redmond’s statement mirrors some of the labels applied to feminists, namely that they “think all sex is rape”.

There’s an analysis in here somewhere, and I’m having trouble with it. :-/

The steps I’m seeing are:

If a woman’s consent matters, then all sex *can* = rape.

Redmond/anti-fems:
If a woman’s consent matters, then all sex *does* = rape.

Again, Red/antis:
If a woman’s consent doesn’t matter, then all sex *does not* = rape.

So the only way to prevent (ignore) rape is (according to antis) to completely disregard women’s consent.

Grrr.

There’s a massive blog post in here somewhere. (April 5, huh?)

]]>